Radical Grace
October – December 2006
Awakened and Astonished—Part II
by Richard Rohr, OFM
Monotheism's great breakthrough was that its
God was “Lord of all the earth.” This is its’ great
truth: “One God who is Father of all, over all, through
all, and within all” (Ephesians 4:6). Doesn’t monotheism
necessarily prepare us for one pattern, one reality, one
world—one love? Yet the religions of Judaism, Christianity,
and Islam have been—up to now—inclusive only at very
small levels. (Catholic Eucharistic practice gives this
away). The very people who defend the “Creator of all
things” are the last ones who really defend that same
creation! Sure, God created all things, but we only have
to love and respect small parts of it, which just happens
to be my part—“Our people” much more than “all
people.” The ecologists, humanists, and some globalists
end up being much more “monotheistic” in practice than
most Christians I know.
As is usual, the Jewish prophets, and one that we do
not usually present as a Jewish prophet, Jesus of Nazareth,
were pointing us relentlessly toward an inclusive and allcompassionate
God. They were the true monotheists,
in all its implications. I personally believe that the
common Christian insistence that Jesus is necessary for
universal salvation is actually an unconscious recognition
that Jesus is teaching a universal message and pointing
history toward the good of all. The prophets were not
tolerant of mere tribal religion or any small belonging
systems, but intuited the universal glory and sovereignty
of their Yahweh.
II Isaiah loves to speak of “the nations counting as
nothingness and emptiness” (40:17), that “all of
humanity” will see the glory of God” (40:5), and that
“my house will be a house of prayer for all the peoples”
(56:7), which is later quoted by Jesus. The light revealed
to Israel is to be “the light to all the nations” (42:6) because
their message offers illumination for everybody and not
just for themselves. It has become apparent to me that
particularity, personal election, is first for the sake of a
heightened and condensed experience, but eventually it
always moves toward a universal recognition that is
deemed true for everybody. You have to experience
specialness yourself before it can grow inside of you, and
then you can communicate that same spaciousness and
specialness to others. The constant problem is that we
get trapped in the initial inflating experience and most
stop right there—which only leads to idolatry,
nationalism, group conformity, and religious
righteousness. We stay in the containment task of “the
first half of life” and never get on to generative religion.1
Paul himself only slowly comes to this, as described in
Romans 9-11, and summed up in his phrase “the whole
batch of dough is holy if the first yeast is made holy; all
the branches are holy if the root is holy” (11:16).
Jesus is the universalist par excellance, always making
the outsider the heroes of his stories: the non-Jews appear
as those with more faith and more compassion, the sinners
become those who are saved, the women better than the
men, and as he continually puts it, “the last will be first”—
while the so-called elect and chosen are his constant
opponents. Jesus’ clear criterion for one who speaks
with authority is simply one who has gone through the
belly of the whale experience, or what he calls the “sign
of Jonah,” the “only” sign he will give. Neither
membership in any group (“a throne”) nor correct
verbiage (“Lord, Lord”) is what gives you authority in
Jesus’ understanding, but those who “drink the cup that
I must drink and are baptized with the baptism with
which I must be baptized” (Mark 10:39). This is “the
true authority of those who have suffered” and come
through the cleansing bath transformed.2
Jesus reaches this shocking and scandalous conclusion
because his starting place is quite different. He does not
begin with any preoccupation with human sinfulness or
the weighing of worthiness or unworthiness (that is the
preoccupation of the ego). In fact, he just assumes that
we are all “sick and in need of a physician.”
As he puts it, “I did not come to call the virtuous” (Mark
2:17). Jesus’ starting place is human suffering instead of
human sinfulness. How else can you explain his fulltime
ministry of healing, exorcism, affirmation of the
excluded ones, and the alleviation of human distress and
humiliation? He is not naïve about sin, but just recognizes
that human sinfulness, “hardness of heart,” is much more
a symptom than a cause. Sin largely reveals the problem
and he uses it for diagnostic purposes not for condemnation or
exclusion. Sin, for Jesus, is not a set of purity codes or
debt codes—which he goes out of his way to flaunt—
but inner attitudes which blind and bind us inside of
ourselves, and away from communion and mercy.3
It is not moral unworthiness that keeps people from
God, but moral righteousness and self-sufficiency. It is
that simple recognition, which is almost his constant
message, that makes Jesus the ultimate, perennial, and
radical reformer of religion. And why religious people
oppose him. It makes one wonder if such a foundational
critique can ever fashion itself into a proper religion at
all. I agree with Simone Weil who said that the problem
with Christianity is that it insists on seeing itself as a
separate religion, instead of a healing message for all
religions. I am afraid that is what will always emerge
when you have religion without spirituality, or pious
practices without inner experience. The very best thing
will then become the very worst thing, and the only
way through is to be awakened and astonished by a divine
love that is of an utterly new dimension.
Read Part I of “Awakened and Astonished,” published in the July/August/September 2006 edition of Radical Grace. The article was first published in its entirety in the March/April 2006 edition of The Pastoral Review, © The Tablet Publishing Company Limited, ISSN1748-362X, London, England.
Fr. Richard Rohr is
a Franciscan of the New Mexico province and founder of the Center
for Action and Contemplation in Albuquerque, NM.
If you enjoyed what you read, please consider joining
the growing community of CAC friends and supporters by making a
financial contribution. In return, you will receive a year’s worth
(four quarterly issues) of Radical Grace.
|