Radical Grace
Oct-Dec 2009
MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE OR UNITIVE SEEING?
By Rev. Dr. Cynthia Bourgeault
In my own spiritual practice I’m more and more clearly
seeing the need to distinguish between two closely-related but distinctly different phenomena: mysticism
and unitive seeing. Much of the “bad rap” that mysticism
has unfortunately gained in the mainstream Christianity
of the West comes from a failure to distinguish between
these two terms.
Mysticism means seeing Oneness.
Unitive Seeing means seeing from Oneness.
The first term yields us the familiar “mystical experience”
so beloved and eagerly sought by many spiritual seekers,
and delightfully summarized in that old joke: “What did
the mystic say to the hot dog vendor?” “Make me one with
everything.” To perceive oneself as “one with everything”
is to directly experience the flow of divine abundance
that holds everything together; to know directly (rather
than merely deduce) the extravagant Trinitarian joy with
which everything is at all times giving itself away and
receiving itself back from the molten flow of love at the
center of everything. Physically, it creates an ineradicable
experience of belonging, and thus is usually accompanied
by feelings of bliss, peace, and an overwhelming sense of
felt meaning. Sometimes the experience is so strong that
it overwhelms the normal circuits of our usual cognitive
perception (which perceive through differentiation), and
hence results in that ecstatic and even incoherent babbling
for which mystics are so celebrated.
Because the emotional content is so delicious,
however—and given the overall affective and relational
bent of Christian metaphysics—the tendency is to put the
emphasis on the experience itself rather than the shift in
perceptual field that it signals. The word “mystical” is almost
always immediately coupled with the word “experience,”
and a mystical experience becomes something that you
have—or want to have, anyway. It becomes a sign of God’s
special favor—a kind of spiritual “peak experience”—and
circumstances promising to deliver that experience are
eagerly sought after: from sacred chanting and Eucharistic
devotion to Sufi whirling, solitude in the desert, or peyote.
In the usual way of looking at things, it is an altered
state of consciousness, ecstatic, something that takes you
far beyond your usual self, a straight shot into divine
consciousness.
What’s so bad about that?
Well, nothing, really. But from the point of view of real
spiritual growth, it’s an immature state— a “state” rather
than a “stage,” in the helpful language of Ken Wilber. A
state is a place you go to; a stage is a place you come from:
integrated and mature spiritual experience. It’s true that a
mystical experience can indeed be a sneak preview of how
the universe looks from the point of view of non-dual
consciousness. And it’s true that this consciousness does
indeed operate at a higher level of vibrational intensity,
which at first can overwhelm our normal cognitve systems.
But the point is not to squander this infusion of energy
on bliss trips, but to learn to contain it within a quiet
and spacious consciousness and allow it to permanently
bring about a shift in our operating system, so that unitive
(or non-dual) perception becomes our ordinary, and
completely normal mode of perception.
I have spoken quite a bit in other places (particularly in
my book, The Wisdom Jesus) about these operating systems:
a good metaphor from the computer world to describe the
very different physiological undergirdings of our normal
egoic consciousness (which perceives by differentiation)
and mature unitive consciousness (which perceives by
instantly grasping the whole). Unitive consciousness can
hold both ends of a paradox at once and look directly
at the Oneness in which all the bits and pieces of our
normally atomized field of vision find their whole. What
is not normally recognized in discussions of these two
distinctly different modes of consciousness is that they
do, indeed, operate on different energetic frequencies.
Our normal egoic consciousness is a relatively low-level
state. Unitive consciousness both requires and confers far
greater capacities of spiritual attention, surrender, clarity,
and equanimity. What is “ecstatic” for egoic consciousness
is simply the new baseline—enstatic—for a higher and
more mature spiritual consciousness. “The love that
moves the sun and the stars” (in Dante’s beautiful words)
neither overwhelms the system nor results in chaotic
utterance or “weird” behavior. It is utterly steady on its
feet and can communicate, rather than merely indulging in
self-expression.
There is a learning curve involved here, of course, which
is why some schools of esoteric Christianity speak of ascetic
training as “a strengthening of the nervous system.” But one
does not have to resort to esoteric training in order to find the
basic teaching explained and developed; the core methodology
is right there in classic contemplative Christianity, lurking
under the terms “humility” and “kenosis,” and 100% grounded
in the teachings of Jesus himself.
It is simply: “let go.” If you would see as God sees, you
must flow as God flows.
The contemporary mystical theologian Ramon Panikkar expresses
this idea beautifully in his book Christophany (pp. 115-116): “I am one
with the source insofar as I, too, act as a source by making everything
I have received flow again—just like Jesus.” As a foundational principle
of Christian theology and ethical conduct, this kenotic principle has
long been acknowledged. What is not usually seen, however, is that it
is also Jesus’s basic—and revolutionary—principle for the rewiring of
consciousness.
To arrive at this unified whole, there is only one route to get
there, and it has been known to all the spiritual traditions of
the world: dying to self. The consciousness that “has” mystical
experiences must finally be let go, as consciousness steps out into
that bare, positionless freedom that is unity.
Jesus is emphatic in his insistence on kenosis (letting go); it is the
tie-rod connecting his theology, his practice, and his sacramental selfoffering.
But the kenosis he has in mind is not a stoic stance against a
pitiless reality; rather, it is a direct gateway into a divine reality which
can be immediately experienced as both compassionate and infinitely
generous—as coherent Oneness. Abundance surrounds and sustains
us like the air we breathe; it is only our habitual self-protectiveness
that prevents us from perceiving it. Thus, the real problem with any
constrictive motion (defending, hoarding, accumulating, clinging) is
that it makes us spiritually blind, unable to see the dance of divine
generosity that is always flowing toward us. In Jesus’s teaching, then,
kenosis is first and foremost a visionary tool; its primary purpose
is to cleanse the lens of perception. For it immediately restores the
broken link with the dynamic ground of reality, and ushers us into
unitive wholeness.
We all yearn for mystical experience; it is one of the most prized
of spiritual consolations. But it does not necessarily mean that
one is spiritually “advanced” or on the fast track to transforming
union. There are people who have plenty of mystical experiences
but never acquire stable non-dual consciousness. And there are
people who have never had a mystical experience in their entire
lives, who gradually, over the course of faithful kenotic practice,
simply come to see from Oneness. I have met many of these
people in monasteries; they are the old, usually simple monks in
whom humility has gradually carved a heart that can contain the
infinite.
In fact, there is a school of Sufism—the so-called “Silent
Sufis”—who make this enstatic route their entire practice. On
the outside, they are simple, ordinary tradesfolks. They bake bread,
drive taxis, make small talk with you as they count out your
change. Nothing betrays their quiet, alert presence. But inside,
their hearts are on fire with divine love and mystical cosmoses
whirl all around them. To hold the tension between the two realms
gently and unassumingly is seen as the very essence of a mature
human being and the highest form of spiritual servanthood.
The Rev. Dr. Cynthia Bourgeault, an Episcopal priest and international retreat leader, is the founder and principal teacher for the Aspen Wisdom School as well as a founding director and the principal teacher for the Contemplative Society (www. contemplative.org). She is the author of numerous books, most recently Mystical Hope: Trusting in the Mercy of God. Guest speaker Cynthia Bourgeault, together with Presenters James Finley and Richard Rohr, will be joining voices at the CAC-sponsored Year Beginning conference, Following the Mystics Through the Narrow Gates, Albuquerque, New Mexico January 2010.
If you enjoyed what you read, please consider joining
the growing community of CAC friends and supporters by making a
financial contribution. In return, you will receive a year's worth
(four quarterly issues) of Radical Grace.